<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>IHCS</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Occidental Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2383-0581</Issn>
				<Volume>11</Volume>
				<Issue>21</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A critique of Martin Buber’s dialogical and its implications in the realm of children’s education</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>A critique of Martin Buber’s dialogical and its implications in the realm of children’s education</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>235</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>253</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">5531</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30465/os.2020.5531</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Azam</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mohseni</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. Candidate in Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyed Massoud</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sayf</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Fath Taheri</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>06</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>educators criticized this concept and said that the teaching process should be led by the teacher alone and students cannot and shouldn’t play a role in this process. Buber pointed out that there must be a safe distance between teacher and student to maintain the educational relationship; meanwhile, introduced the doctrine of “Education based on Dialogue”. In other words, he calls the educational relationship as a kind of “I – Thou relationship”. Now the question is that while Buber knows the “I – Thou relationship” as a mutualrelationship, how can he interpret the relationship between teacher and student as a “I – Thou relationship” and at the same time he says it is one-sided inclusive.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">educators criticized this concept and said that the teaching process should be led by the teacher alone and students cannot and shouldn’t play a role in this process. Buber pointed out that there must be a safe distance between teacher and student to maintain the educational relationship; meanwhile, introduced the doctrine of “Education based on Dialogue”. In other words, he calls the educational relationship as a kind of “I – Thou relationship”. Now the question is that while Buber knows the “I – Thou relationship” as a mutualrelationship, how can he interpret the relationship between teacher and student as a “I – Thou relationship” and at the same time he says it is one-sided inclusive.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Martin Buber</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">“I – It relation”</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">“I – Thou relationship”</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Mutuality</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Education</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">http://occidentstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5531_129a941c22808a997afb6b97849a86ed.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
