Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Abstract

The major issue of the present article is to explain McDowell’s attempt to determine the conditions which knowledge must satisfy if it is to be an objective knowledge, and to explain McDowell’s proving procedure of how our intellectual activity can make us answerable to reality. By explaining these conditions, in fact, McDowell’s solution to the epistemological problem of relationship between mind and world is clarified. In this respect, his ideas along two axes are put forward: first, his therapeutic analysis about the causes that generate this problem; and second, his positive ideas that represent his specific attitude toward the world, mind, naturalism in philosophy of mind, and the position of experience in the system of justification.

Keywords

 
McDowell, John (1996). Mind and World, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
McDowell, John (2000). ‘Towards Rehabilitating Objectivity’, in Rorty and His Critics, Robert B. (ed.), Brandom: Basil Blackwell.
McDowell, John (2009a). ‘Experiencing the World’, in The Engaged Intellect, Philosophical Essays, Harvard University Press.
McDowell, John (2009b). ‘Naturalism in the Philosophy of Mind’, in The Engaged Intellect, Philosophical Essays, Harvard University Press.
Putnan, Hillary (2002). ‘McDowell’ Mind and McDowell’s World’, in Reading McDowell: on Mind and World, Nicholas H. Smith (ed.), London and New York.
Rorty, Richard (1980). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Basil Blackwell.
Rorty, Richard (1991). Consequences of Pragmatism, University of Minnesota Press.
Rorty, Richard (1996). Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press.
Sandra, M. Dingli (2005). On Thinking and the World: John McDowell’s Mind and World, Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Sellars, Wilfrid (1963). ‘Epiricism and the Philosophy of Mind’, in science, Perception, and Reality, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.