Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Faculty Member, Department of Philosophy, Imam Khomeini International University

Abstract

This article argues that “democracy” does not necessarily guarantee “liberty” and “human rights,” and analyzes the causes of such an inconsistency and the solutions for reconciling them in the ideas of James Madison, Alexis de Tocqueville, and John Stuart Mill. The US founding fathers and the Federalist authors, found out the possibility of the emergence of this inconsistency and, following Locke and Montesquieu, proposed a set of “institutional devices” such as “separation of powers,” “a system of representation,” “a system of checks and balances,” and “legal guarantees of minority rights” to defend “liberty” and “human rights.” However, distinguishing “social and cultural causes” from “political and institutional causes,” this article believes that this problem in “democracy” is too complicated to be solved by mere “institutional devices.” It argues that “violating minority rights,” “suppression,” “tyranny of the majority,” and “despotism of the custom” are still possible even in a democratic system, and it is impossible to solve them by mere “institutional devices.” So, using Tocqueville’s observations and argumentations in Democracy of America, his distinction between “mild despotism” and “tyranny of the majority,” and also the concept of “public consent” in Noam Chomsky’s and Edward S. Herman’s Manufacturing Consent, this article analyzes the possible types of “tyranny” and “despotism” in a democratic system, the effect of “mild despotism” on “self-censorship,” “political and social pressures on the dissenters,” and incapability of the mere “institutional device”" in solving these problems. Then, it shows the development of the theory of “mild despotism” in Mill’s theory of “despotism of the custom,” and analyzes his argumentation that it is more dangerous than “political despotism” for “development and welfare in society.” Finally, it analyzes Mill’s theoretical and practical proposals for solving this problem.

Keywords

تکویل، اَ. ([1347] 1383). تحلیل دموکراسی در آمریکا. رحمت الله مقدم مراغه‌ای (مترجم). تهران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
Acton, J. E. E. D. (1907). “The History of Freedom in Antiquity” in John Neville Figgis and Reginald Vere Laurence (eds.), The History of Freedom and Other Essays. London: Macmillan.
Berlin, I. (1969). Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.           
Bureau of Int’l Information Programs. ([2010] 2013). Outline of U.S. Government. Washington: United States Department of State.
Burke, E. (1790). Reflections on the revolution in France: And on the proceedings in certain societies in London relative to that event. London: Printed for J. Dodsley.
Chomsky, N. (1996). Class Warfare. London: Pluto Press.
Feinberg, J. (1984). Harm to Others. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hamilton, A. (1787). Federalist NO. 1. New York: Independent Journal.
Hamilton, A., Madison, J., Jay, J., Rossiter, C., & Kesler, C. R. (1999). The Federalist papers. New York, N.Y: Mentor.
Herman, E. S. & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon Books.
Jefferson, T. (1788). A Letter to James Madison. (Open Document, URL = <https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-11-02-0257>, accessed 06.06.2017).
Lippmann, W. (1922). Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
Madison, J. (1787). Federalist NO. 10. New York: New York Packet.
Mansfield, H. C. (2010). Tocqueville. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mill, J. S. ([1861] 2001). Considerations on Representative Government. Ontario: Batoche Books.
Mill, J.S. ([1859] 1998). On Liberty. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University. (Open Document, URL = <http://www2.hn.psu.edu/faculty/jmanis/jsmill/liberty.pdf/>, accessed 02.22.2017).
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pilger, J. (2005). “Let's face it - the state has lost its mind.” NewStatesman.  16 May 2005. (Open Document, URL = <http://www.newstatesman.com/node/192496>, accessed 06.06.2017).
Rand, A. (1961). For the New Intellectual. New York: New American Library.
Rand, A. (1967). Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal. New York: Signet.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rossiter, C. ([1961] 2003). “Introduction” in Clinton Rossiter and Charles R. Kesler (eds.). The Federalist Papers. New York: Signet Classics.
Ten, C. L. (1980). Mill on Liberty. Oxford: Clarendon University Press. (Open Document, URL = <http://www.victorianweb.org/philosophy/mill/ten/>, accessed 06.06.2017).
Ten, C. L. (2009). Mill’s On Liberty: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tocqueville, A. ([1835] 2002). Harvey C. Mansfield and Delba Winthrop (trans.). Democracy in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Internet Resources