Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 ph.d student at azad university

2 استادیار گروه علوم سیاسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکز

Abstract

Reviving the role of religion in modern societies and the attention of those like Habermas to this phenomenon, by new articulations, have challenged dualities such as tradition-modernity, public-private, and secular-religious. For this reason, the direct connection between modernization and secularisation is now completely out of place. This article, with this in mind, has also tried to focus on the transformation of Habermas' votes in relation to the public sphere and the place of religion in it, Argues that Habermas's perspective on religion has changed in his various stages of thought, and this view has changed from a philosophical critique to a positive socio-political look. This is due to the perception of the realities of the contemporary world, and Habermas, by understanding this fact, has posited the concept of post-secularism as a rethinking of secularist perspectives as well as the role of religion in the public domain. Accepting such a concept, in turn, promotes Habermas' view of the acceptance of coexistence and plurality in political life.

Keywords

Aguirre, J., 2012. Post metaphysical Reason and Post secular Consciousness: Habermas’ Analysis of Religion in the Public Sphere. s.l.:Stony Brook University.
Calhoun, C., ed., 1996. Habermas and the public sphere. Forth printing ed. s.l.:Massachusetts institute of technology.
Eicklman, A. S. &. D. F. ed., 2002. Public Islam and the common good.
Gripsrud, J., 2009. Digisting the public sphere: two key issues. javnost the public, Vol.16(No. 1,), pp. pp. 5 - 16.
Habermas, J., 1983. Philosophical-Political Profiles. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Habermas, J., 1983. Philosophical-Political Profiles. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Habermas, j., 1992. Legitimation Crisis. s.l.: Polity Press.
Habermas, J., 2002. Religion and Rationality: Essays on Reason, God, and Modernity. s.l.: Polity Press.
Habermas, J., 2006. Religion in the Public Sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14(1), p. 1–25.
Habermas, j., 2008. Between Naturalism and Religion. Malden: Polity Press.
Jurgen habermas, Thomas McCarthy 1977. Hannah Arendt's Communications Concept of Power. Social Research, 44(1), pp. 3-24.
Mckee, A., 2005. The Public Sphere: An Introduction. s.l.: Cambridge University Press.
Rosi Braidotti, B. B. d. G. M. ed., 2014. Transformations of Religion and the Public Sphere: Post secular Publics. s.l.: Palgrave McMillan.
Salvatore, A., 2007. The Public Sphere, Liberal Modernity, Catholicism, Islam. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sandhu, A., 2007. Intellectuals and the People. s.l.: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sheedy, M., 2016. Habermas and Religion. Religion Compass, 10(3), p. 58–73.
Singh, P. L. a. A. ed., 2010. From Political Theory to Political Theology: Religious Challenges and the Prospects of Democracy. s.l.: continuum.
Veronika, R. W. a. K. ed., 2008. Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co.
 
اسکمبلر، گراهام ، هابرماس، نظریه انتقادی و سلامت، حسینعلی نوذری، تهران،   ١٣٩٦انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی
بهرام, ح. غ. م., 1394. تحول آرای فلسفی یورگن هابرماس درباره نقش دین در حوزه عمومی. فلسفه, 2(43), pp. 21-38.
بهرامی, م., 1395. تحول آرای یورگن هابرماس درباره نقش دین در حوزه عمومی. تهران : وایا
راد, ع. پ. و. م. ق. ed., 1395. هابرماس و روشنفکران ایرانی. تهران: طرح نقد
رالز, ج., 1392. لیبرالیسم سیاسی. تهران: ثالث
زارعی, آ., 1394. پست سکولاریسم؛ مذهب و حوزهی عمومی در اندیشه یورگن هابرماس. پژوهش نامه علوم سیاسی, بهار, 2(10), pp. 79-111.
هابرماس, یورگن, 1380. فراسکیولاریسم. همشهری ماه, بهمن, 1(11), pp. 59-61.