Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD student in Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Qazvin Imam Khomeini International University

2 Associate Professor, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Wisdom, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin

Abstract

Aristotle's main concern in this discussion is the issue of merit in rule and the division of its offices. For this purpose, he examines different political regimes and expresses the objections of those regimes in this regard. He says the distribution of political offices should be based on everyone's contribution to the preservation and provision of the elements of existence and the organization of rule. He also states that the standard of correct and errant regime is provide as much "common advantage " as possible. That is, regimes that seek the benefit of rulers are errant and unjust regimes, and regimes that seek the benefit of the people of society are correct and just. Then, with this standard, he describes the best political regime. He says that this is the regimes consist in serious human beings are ruling and being ruled with a view to the life in accord with virtue. But in the end he concludes that this regime is not feasible, so he proposes a mixed arrangement in which the best hold the ruling offices while the multitude share in deliberation and judging.

Keywords

منابع:
ارسطو؛ (1384)، اخلاق نیکوماخس، ترجمه سید ابوالقاسم پور حسینی، تهران، انتشارات سمت.
ارسطو؛(1390)، اخلاق نیکوماخس، ترجمه محمدحسن لطفی، تهران، انتشارات طرح نو.
ارسطو؛ (1386)،  سیاست، ترجمه حمید عنایت، تهران، انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی
مکاینتایر، السیدر؛ (1362)، درپی فضیلت، ترجمه حمید شهریاری و محمد علی شمالی، تهران، انتشارات سمت
یگر، ورنر؛(1392)، ارسطو: مبانی تاریخ تحول اندیشه وی، ترجمه حسین کلباسی اشتری، تهران انتشارات امیر کبیر.
Bartlett, Robert C; (2001). The Idea of Enlightenment: A Post-mortem Study. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
 
Bolotin, David; (1999). “Aristotle on the Question of Evil.” In Action and Contemplation:Studies in the Moral and Political Thought of Aristotle, edited by Robert C. Bartlett and Susan D. Collins, 159-169. New York: SUNY Press.
 
Bruell, Christopher; (2006). “Aristotle on Theory and Practice: Part One.” An unpublished talk delivered at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales in Paris, 1-18.
 
Bywater, Ingram, ed; (1890). Ethica Nicomachea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Corbett, Ross J; (2010). “Aristotelian Kingship and Lockean Prerogative.” In RecoveringReason: Essays in Honor of Thomas L. Pangle, edited by Timothy Bums, 251— 261. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
 
Corbett, Ross J; (2010). “Aristotelian Kingship and Lockean Prerogative.” In RecoveringReason: Essays in Honor of Thomas L. Pangle, edited by Timothy Bums, 251— 261. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
 
Goldberg, Robert; (2010). “Civic or Human Virtue in Aristotle’s Politics.” In RecoveringReason: Essays in Honor of Thomas L. Pangle, edited by Timothy Bums, 129— 146. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
 
MacIntyre, Alasdair; (2006). Ethics and Politics: Selected Essays, Vol. 2. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Simpson, Peter L. 1998. A Philosophical Commentary on the Politics of Aristotle. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.