Anthropocentric in the Transition from Modern Philosophy to Phenomenology

Barandak, Farhad; Babaei Aghdam, Fereidoun; Mahmoudzadeh, Hassan

doi:10.30465/os.2022.40289.1808

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

¹ PhD student of Geography and Urban Planning, Planning and Environmental Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

² Associate Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Planning and Environmental Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

https://doi.org/10.30465/os.2022.40289.1808

Abstract

The present study deals with the matter of human recognition (specifically anthropocentric). Here we examine the term anthropocentric in the transition from modern philosophy to phenomenology. Our attempt here is to do this with a qualitative analysis of the works and first-hand texts of modern philosophical and phenomenological thinkers. This transition can be followed by "recognition of consciousness". With the influence of Bacon and Descartes, Kant began with doubt, and with his transcendence he brought certainty and conciseness, and carried out the plan to humanize science by eliminating man. Hegel makes this certainty with the phenomenology of the soul and his dialectical scheme with the connection of man and soul in the course of history. Husserl, whose name is familiar with phenomenology, tries to establish certain science with the slogan "Return to Things"; But he brought the "lifeworld" to the relativists, and at the end of his life he considered the dream of philosophy as a certain science to be over. Heidegger (transcendental) puts man at the center of the world. Dasein is always present in the world. The present study reinforces human-centered approaches in which human beings have always been and will always be central.

Keywords

References

حسینی، علی وحسین پور، مهناز (1398)، ‌پدیدارشناسی هرمنوتیکی به مثابه یک روش در فلسفه ‌مارتین هیدگر‌، دوفصلنامه هستی و شناخت، سال 6، ش 1، صص 231- 261.

حقی، علی (1381). ‌مرور مراحل سه گانه پدیدار‌شناسی هوسرل‌، فلسفه، ش 2 و 3، صص 197- 212.

رحیمیان، سعید و رهبر، حسن (1388)، ‌معرفت‌شناسی در نظام فلسفی دکارت و سهرودی‌، فصلنامه تاملات فلسفی، سال 1، ش 4، صص 7- 25.

رمضانی، نجمه و مشکات، محمد (1392)، ‌بررسی تطبیقی گشتل در اندیشه هایدگر و پارادائم در اندیشه کوهن‌، ذهن، ش 56، صص 141- 168.

سفیدخوش، میثم (1389)، ‌اختلاف در تفسیر ایده‌ی پدیدارشناسی هگل؛ دلایل، دسته‌بندی و ارزیابی نقدی‌، شناخت، ش 62، صص 83- 106.

سیدی، محمدجواد و حیدری، احمدعلی (1395)، ‌نقد هایدگر بر مفهوم جهان در فلسفه دکارت، مجله پژوهش‌های فلسفی کلامی‌، سال 18، ش 2، صص 37- 60.

عیش‌آبادی، سعید (1388)، ‌نگاهی گذرا بر تاریخچه معنای فنومن و تقویم آن در فنومنولوژی هگل و هوسرل‌، پژوهش‌های فلسفی، دوره 6، ش 15، صص 97-120.

فتحی، حسن و موسی‌زاده، صدیقه (1390)، ‌دیالکتیک هگل: سنتزی از دیالکتیک کانت در برابر دیالکتیک افلاطون، تاریخ فلسفه، سال 2، ش 1، صص 49- 80.

فلاح رفیع، علی (1383)، «پدیدارشناسی هگل: ابعاد و تاثیر آن در آموزش و پرورش»، معرفت فلسفی، سال 2، ش 1، صص 109- 132.

قربانی، قدرت الله (1387)، ‌علم‌گرایی انسان محور کانت و تاثیرات آن بر نظریه اخلاقی و دینی او‌، معرفت فلسفی، دوره 5، ش 19، صص 245- 274.

قزلسفلی، محمد تقی (1386)، ‌ویژگی‌های معرفت‌شناختی اندیشه در پیشامدرن، مدرن و پسامدرن‌، پژوهشنامه علوم سیاسی، سال 3، ش 1، صص 119- 157.

ملایری، محمدحسین (1382)، ‌درنگی در تأملات بنیادگزار پدیدارشناسی: در سنگلاخِ ارضِ موعود هوسرلی‌، راهبرد، دوره 11، ش 28. صص 367- 398.

هایدگر، مارتین (1388)، هستی و زمان، ترجمه سیاوش جمادی، تهران: ققنوس.

Badmington, N (2003). Theorizing Posthumanism. Cultural Critique, No. 53, pp. 10–27. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1354622

Bermudez, J (2008). Cartesian Skepticism: Arguments and Antecedents. in: Greco, J (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. New York. Oxford University.

Boddice, R (2011). Anthropocentrism: Humans, Animals, Environments. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.

Bunnin, N & Yu, J (2004). The Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy. Malden. Wiley-Blackwell.

Burchett, K, L (2016). Anthropocentrism as Environmental Ethic. Thesis Philosophy. The University of Kentucky.

Burkhard, J (2004). Apostolicity Then and Now: An Ecumenical Church in a Postmodern World. Minnesota. Liturgical.

Cappelen, H., Gendler, T & Hawthorne, J (2016). The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology. USA: Oxford University.

Chiodo, S (2020). ‌Prometheus and the evolution of the relationship between humans and technology‌. Studi di estetica. No. 16, pp. 209- 229.

Chistyakova, O., Liu, Y & Tsai, W (2020). Understanding of Man in Western and Eastern Cultural Traditions. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Vol. 416, pp. 568- 573.

Crouse, R (2008). St Augustine and Descartes as Fathers of Modernity. in: Robertson, N., McOuat, G & Vinci, T (Eds). Descartes and the Modern. Newcastle upon Tyne. Cambridge Scholars.

Cutrofello, A (2005). Continental Philosophy: A Contemporary Introduction. New York. Routledge.

Dougherty, C (2006). Prometheus. New York. Routledge.

Dowling, M (2007). ‌From Husserl to van Manen. A review of different phenomenological approaches‌. International Journal of Nursing Studies. Vol. 44. No. 1. pp. 131-142.

Eva, L (2011). Bacon’s Doctrine of the Idols and Skepticism. In: Machuca, D (Ed.). Pyrrhonism in Ancient, Modern, and Contemporary Philosophy. Dordrecht. Springer.

Fischer, k (1857). Francis Bacon of Verulam: Realistic philosophy and its age. London. Longman.

Hegel, G. W. F (1977). Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated: Miller. A. V. New York. Oxford University.

Hoffe, O (2010). Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: The Foundation of Modern Philosophy. Dordrecht. Springer.

Houlgate, S (2013). Hegel's 'Phenomenology of Spirit': A Reader's Guide. London. Bloomsbury Academic.

Kochan, J (2011). ‌Husserl and the phenomenology of science‌. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Vol. 42. No. 3. pp. 467-471.

Kopnina, H (2019). Anthropocentrism and Post-Humanism. in: Callan, H (Ed). The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology. New York. Wiley-Blackwell.

LeCain, T, J (2021). A post-anthropocentric politics: Can neo-materialist theory provide effective solutions to the problems of global mining?. The Extractive Industries and Society, Vol. 8, No. 4, 100825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.10.008

Machuca, D (2011). Introduction. In: Machuca, D (Ed.). Pyrrhonism in Ancient, Modern, and Contemporary Philosophy, Dordrecht. Springer.

Manzo, S (2017). Reading Scepticism Historically. Scepticism, Acatalepsia and the Fall of Adam in Francis Bacon. in: Smith, P & Charles, S (Eds.). Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy. Cham. Springer International.

Molczanow, A (2012). Quantification: Transcending Beyond Frege’s Boundaries: A Case Study in Transcendental-Metaphysical Logic. Leiden. Brill Academic.

Moran, D & Cohen, J (2012). The Husserl Dictionary. London. Continuum International Publishing Group.

Nilsson, A & Levitsky, M (2016). ‌Humanistic and normativistic metaphysics, epistemology, and conative orientation: Two fundamental systems of meaning‌. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 100. pp. 85-94.

Nimmo, R (2011).The Making of the Human: Anthropocentrism in Modern Social Thought. In: Boddice, R (Ed). Anthropocentrism: Humans, Animals, Environments. Leiden. Brill Academic.

Olsen, G (2012). The Turn to Transcendence: The Role of Religion in the Twenty-First Century. Washington, D.C. Catholic University of America.

Pickles, J (2009). Phenomenology, Science and Geography; Spatiality and the Human Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Relph, E (1985). Geographical experiences and being-in-the-world: The phenomenological origins of geography. In: Seamon, D & Mugerauer, R (Eds), Dwelling, Place, and Environment: Towards a Phenomenology of Person and World. Dordrect: Martinus Nijhoff.

Roe, E, J (2009). Human-Nonhuman. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. pp. 251-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00702-1

Sax, B (2011). What is this Quintessence of Dust? The Concept of the ‘Human’ and its Origins. In: Boddice, R (Ed). Anthropocentrism: Humans, Animals, Environments. Leiden. Brill Academic.

Scbillritger, G (1984). “Man's enduring technological dilemma: Prometheus, Faust, and other macro-engineers”. Technology in Society. Vol. 6. No. 1. pp. 59-71.

Seamon, D. (2000) A Way of Seeing People and Place. In: Wapner S., Demick J., Yamamoto T., Minami H. (eds) Theoretical Perspectives in Environment-Behavior Research. Boston: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4701-3_13

Simpson, P & Ash, J (2020). Phenomenology and Phenomenological Geography. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (Second Edition). pp. 79-84.

Stang, N. F (2021). Kant’s Transcendental Idealism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Tonner, P (2011). Are Animals Poor in the World? A Critique of Heidegger’s Anthropocentrism. In: Boddice, R (Ed). Anthropocentrism: Humans, Animals, Environments. Leiden. Brill Academic.

Ward, S (1997). The Social Production of Postmodern Skepticism. Sociological Focus, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 247-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00380237.1997.10571077

Occidental Studies

Anthropocentric in the Transition from Modern Philosophy to Phenomenology

References

References

Volume 12, Issue 2 - Serial Number 24
March 2022
Pages 1-24

Anthropocentric in the Transition from Modern Philosophy to Phenomenology

References

References

Volume 12, Issue 2 - Serial Number 24March 2022Pages 1-24

Volume 12, Issue 2 - Serial Number 24
March 2022
Pages 1-24