Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

• mostafa abedi jige ¹
• mohsen bagerzade meshkibaf ²
• Muhammad Asgahri ³

¹ PhD student in Philosophy, University of Tabriz

² PhD in Philosophy, University of Tabriz

³ Associate Professor of philosophy at Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages in university of Tabriz-Iran

Abstract

Before Machiavelli, in order to explain the transition from subject to object, he justified concepts that played a pivotal role in the transition from subject to object, or vice versa, which were essentially theological-metaphysical concepts, but Machiavelli in his political thought defined There is a new relation, and it must be achieved, that Hegel was later able to use in his ontology in a complex interpretation - and a critique of the views of the likes of Kant and Fichte, who are and should have dealt with the separation of territory. Influenced by Machiavelli, instead of inferring, hegel's ontological and transcendent affairs should be sought in the midst of the effective facts of this world, and thus he was able to criticize the precedence of subject over object, as philosophically explained by Kant, and the dialectical relation. Study between the two from a normative point of view. The author tries to present a new interpretation of the problem and must explain in Machiavelli's thought the logic of Hegel's transition from subject to object and how to replace normative logic with transcendent logic in this regard.

Keywords

• Machiavelli
• the effective reality
• is and should be
• the norm Hegel