Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD in Western Philosophy, University of Tabriz

2 PhD student in Western Philosophy, University of Tabriz

10.30465/os.2022.39302.1790

Abstract

In terms of strategic foundations, the theory of government in the political philosophy of Kant and Fichte have much in common. For this reason, it is not only possible to examine these two political theories in one article, but it also helps to make a more accurate comparison and thus a better understanding of the two philosophers in terms of distinctions. The author believes that the objections of their political theories are to a large extent compatible with each other. Because the government, based on their political philosophy, unlike other areas of thought, has been conceived and written in the field of experience and objectivity. In such circumstances, both philosophers place their abstract foundations as a test of the gravitational field of objectivity or experience, and the question is whether they can establish a union between thought and action and write political thought in the style of their epistemology and ethics. In other words, can they establish transcendental or moral and legal freedom in the realm of external objectivity or the state where political philosophy is to be formed?

Keywords

منابع فارسی و انگلیسی
بریزیل، دنیل(1394)، فیشته، ترجمه مسعود حسینی، تهران: ققنوس، چاپ اول
تیلور،چارلز(1379)، هگل و جامعه‌ی مدرن، ترجمه منوچهر حقیقی‌راد، تهران: مرکز، چاپ اول
فیشته، یوهان گوتلیب(1398)، بنیاد حق طبیعی: بر اساس اصول آموزه‌ی دانش، ترجمه مسعود حسینی، تهران: ققنوس، چاپ اول
امانوئل،کانت(1398)، دین در محدوده عقل تنها، تهران: نشر نقش و نگار، چاپ چهارم
لوکاچ، گئورگ (1374). هگل جوان: پژوهشی در رابطه دیالکتیک و اقتصاد، ترجمه محسن حکیمی، تهران: نشر مرکز، چاپ اول
هگل، گئورک فردریش ویلهلم(1394) عناصر فلسفه حق یا خلاصه‌ای از حقوق‌طبیعی و علم سیاست، ترجمه مهبد ایرانی‌طلب، تهران: نشر قطره، چاپ سوم

Arendt, H. (1992). Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy. Brighton,: The University of Chicago Press.

Beiser, F. C. (1992). Enlightenment, Revolution, and Romanticism: The Genesis of Modern German Political Thought,1790-1800. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Fichte, J. G. (2000). Foundations of Natural Right: According to the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre. (F. Neuhouser, Ed., & M. Baur, Trans.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hegel, G. F. (1977). The Difference between Fichte's and Schelling's System of Philosophy. (H. S. Harris, & W. Cerf, Trans.) Albany: State University of New York Press.
James, D. (2011). Fichte's Social and Political philosophy: property and virtu. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.
James, D. (2015). FICHTE’S REPUBLIC: Idealism, History and Nationalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1989a). Idea for a universal history with a cosmopolitan purpose. (R. Geuss, & Q. Skinner, Eds.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1989b). Kant: political Writing. (R. Geuss, & Q. Skinner, Eds.) cambridge: Cambridge university press.
Kant, I. (1989c). Perpetual peace: A philosophical sketch. (R. Geuss, & Q. Skinner, Eds.) Cambrige: Cambride University Press.
Kant, I. (1989d). The contest of Faculties. (R. Geuss, & Q. Skinner, Eds.) Cambridge: Cambridge University              Press.
Kant, I. (1989e). This maybe True in Theory but it dose not apply in practice. (R. Geuss, & Q. Skinner, Eds.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1991). Metaphysics of Ethics. (R. Geuss, Ed., & M. Gregor, Trans.) New York: Cambrige University Press.
McCumber, J. (2014). Hegel's Mature Critiqe of Kant. California: Stanford University Press.