Beyond the Tradition-Modernity Dichotomy: Reinventing Tradition ( Tajaddod e Sonnat) as an Alternative Insight

Mesbahian, Hossein

doi:10.30465/os.2022.43398.1869

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Hossein Mesbahian

Assistant Professor of Philosophy Department, University of Tehran

10.30465/os.2022.43398.1869

Abstract

This paper seeks to distinguish between the process of reinventing tradition (tajaddod e sonnat) and its ensuing result (Modernity) in order to 1) argue that the two terms are by no means synonymous, and 2) to appropriate the literal usage of the term tajaddod as a means to introduce the process of reinventing as an alternative insight to step beyond the all too familiar dichotomy between tradition and modernity. I argue that the sociopolitical developments that have resulted in the rise of what many have called “the plurality of modernity” must take the concept of tradition as a central and foundational concept. For example, the dichotomy between tradition and modernity has served a fundamental conceptual tool in interpreting and explaining the sociopolitical events that took place in the Middle East during the 1950s and 60s. Of course, these two terms were often used metaphorically: modernity denotes the world of critical observers, whereas tradition denotes the object of critique. What is more disturbing is the cultural presumptions that ultimately guide the way in which this dichotomy is expressed in theories of modernization: Modernity is attributed to the West, while tradition is “non-Western”. In contrast, my claim is that tradition and modernity cannot be regarded as opposing philosophies in historical progress; for Western modernity is itself a renewed tradition arising essentially from its preceding traditional values and principles.

Keywords

References

منابع

بهنام، جمشید. (۱۳۷۹) «نگاهى دوباره بر مسئله تجدّد» مجله ایران نامه، سال 18 شماره 2. صص ۲۷-۴۲.

نصر، سید حسین. (1382). «مروری بر اندیشه های دین پژوهی فریتیوف شوآن (آنچه در ادین گوناگون مشترک است) »، ترجمه شهاب الدین عباسی، اخبار ادیان، شماره 1. صص۳۲-۳۷.

نصر، سید حسین. (1385). «تجدد دین را تضعیف کرده است»، بازتاب اندیشه، شماره 77. صص ۵۳-۵۷.

نصر، سید حسین. (1387). «سنت گرایی علیه بنیاد گرایی»، بازتاب اندیشه، شماره 96.صص ۲۳-۳۱.

Afary, Janet and Kevin B. Anderson. (2005). Foucault, Gender, and the Iranian Revolution: The Seductions of Islamism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ahmed, Akbar S. (1992) Postmodernism and Islam: Predicament and Promise. London and New York: Routledge.

Alam, Javeed. (1999). India: Living with Modernity. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Arnason, Johann P.The Future that Failed. Origins and Destinies of the Soviet Model London: Routledge, 1993.

Arnason. Johann P. (1993) The Future that Failed. Origins and Destinies of the Soviet Model. New York: Routledge.

Berman, Marshall. (1992). “Why Modernism Still Matters” in Scott Lash & Jonathan Friedman, Modernity and Identity. Blackwell, 1992.

Delanty, Gerard. (1997). “Habermas and Occidental. Rationalism: The Politics of Identity, Social. Learning, and the Cultural Limits of Moral Universalism.” Sociological Theory, Vol. 15, No. 1: 30-59.

Dussel, Enrique. (2000)“Europe, Modernity, and Eurocentrism,”.In: Nepantla. Views from South (Duke University)I, 3, pp. 465-478.

Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. and Schluchter, Wolfgang. (1998) “Introduction: Paths to early modernities - a comparative view”, in Shmuel N. Eisenstadt and Wolfgang Schluchter (Eds) Early Modernities, special issue of Daedalus 127(3): 1-18.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. (2004) Truth and Method, trans. Joel Weinsheimer and Donald Marshall, New York: Continuum.

Gieben (eds.) The Formation of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Habermas, jurgen. (1987).The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.

Habermas. Jurgen. (1983) “Modernity - An Incomplete Project,” in The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays On Post-Modern Culture, edited by Foster, H., Port Townsend, Washington.

Hall, Stuart. (1992).“The West and the Rest: Discourse and Power.” In Hall, Stuart, and Bram.

Heller, Agnes, and Frenc Feher. (1991). The Postmodern Political Condition. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Linkenbach, Antje. (2000). “Anthropology of Modernity: Projects and Contexts.” Thesis Eleven, Vol. 61, No. 1: 41-63.

Mesbahian, H. (2012). The Man of Desires and Name of God as the Otherwise than Being: God’s Subjectivity and Subjectivity as “other-in-the-Self” versus Human Subjectivity. Jostarha-ye Falsafeh-ye Din (Philosophy of Religion Studies), 1(1), 119-134.

Mesbahian, H. (2019). Reinventing the Self: A Philosophical Encounter with the Historiography of Cultural Identity. Historical Perspective & Historiography, 29(23), 255-274.

Mesbahian, H. (2020). Habermas and the Other of Occidental Rationality: The Dichotomous Logic of Exclusive Inclusion. Falsafeh (The Iranian Journal of Philosophy), University of Tehran, 47(2), 145-165.

Mesbahian, H., & Norris, T. (2017). Dieter Misgeld: A philosopher’s journey from hermeneutics to emancipatory politics: Springer.

Misgeld, D., Norris, T., & Mesbahian, H. (2010). A philosopher's journey from hermeneutics to emancipatory politics. Philosophical Inquiry in Education, 19(2), 86-97.

Mestrovic, Stjepan and Giddens, Anthony. (1998): The Last Modernist. London and New York: Routledge.

Sayyid. Bobby S. (1997) Eurocentrism and the Emergence of Islamism. London and New York: Zed Books.

Schmidt, Volker H. (2006). “Multiple Modernities or Varieties of Modernity?” Current Sociology. Vol 54(1): 77-97.

Shayegan, Daryush. (1992).Cultural Schizophrenia: Islamic Societies Confronting the West, trans. John Howe London.

Taylor, Charles. (2001). “Two Theories of Modernity” The International Scope: Volume 3.Issue 5, available online at: http://www.socialcapital-foundation.org/journal/volume%202001/ issue%205/pdf/Taylor_text, pdf.

Touraine, Alain. (1995) Critique of Modernity. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1995.

Wagner, Peter (1999).“The Resistance that Modernity Constantly Provokes: Europe, America and Social Theory,” Thesis Eleven 58.

Wittrock, Björn (2000).”Modernity: One, None, or Many? European Origins and Modernity as a Global Condition,” Daedalus129,: 31-60.

Occidental Studies

Beyond the Tradition-Modernity Dichotomy: Reinventing Tradition ( Tajaddod e Sonnat) as an Alternative Insight

References

References

Volume 13, Issue 1 - Serial Number 25
June 2022
Pages 97-119

Beyond the Tradition-Modernity Dichotomy: Reinventing Tradition ( Tajaddod e Sonnat) as an Alternative Insight

References

References

Volume 13, Issue 1 - Serial Number 25June 2022Pages 97-119

Volume 13, Issue 1 - Serial Number 25
June 2022
Pages 97-119