Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 Ph.D Student at Moral Philosophy, University of Qom
2 Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, College of Farabi, University of Tehran
Abstract
Defenders of the error theory believe that no moral knowledge can be found. They consider morality to be just a pleasant legend inherited from our ancestors. Russ Shafer-Landau a famous contemporary moral philosopher, believes that what the defenders of the error theory pursue is not only an attack on a specific moral point of view, but they seek to make the entire moral theory ineffective. According to Russ Shafer-Landau , the followers of the error theory to defend their claim must show that firstly, the acceptance of ethics depends on commitment to moral objectivity and the absoluteness of moral reasons, and secondly, even in the assumption that ethics is based on these two presuppositions, Less than one of these two assumptions is false. In this article, by examining the strongest arguments against moral objectivity from Russ Shafer-Landau's point of view and revealing their ineffectiveness, we show that the arguments of the defenders of the error theory against objective morality are, at best and strongest, sterile, and therefore skepticism and the impossibility of knowledge Morality is not a correct view of morality.
Keywords
Blackburn, Simon. (1399) Error-oriented theory about moral philosophy, Encyclopaedia of Moral Philosophy, edited by Paul Edwards, translated by Insha Allah Rahmati, Tehran: Sophia Publishing House.
- Pope, David. (1399.) Ethical Skepticism, Encyclopaedia of Moral Philosophy, edited by Paul Edwards, translated by Insha Allah Rahmati, Tehran: Sofia Publishing House.
- Nathan, David. (2004). Ethical vision , an introduction to moral philosophy, translated by Hasan Miandari, Tehran: Samt Publications.
- Brink, David .(1986). Externalist moral realism, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, Vol. XXIV, Supplement: 23-41
- Dreier, J .(1997). Humean Doubts About the Practical Justification of Morality. In Ethics and Practical Reason, ed. G. Cullity and B. Gaut, 81–100 Oxford: OUP.
- Joyce, Richard .(2001). The Myth of Morality, Cambridge University Press.
- Joyce, Richard .(2021). Moral Anti-Realism, In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy .at : https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/moral-anti-realism/>.
- Kalf, Wouter Floris .(2018). Moral Error Theory, Palgrave Macmillan.
- Mackie, John Leslie .(1977). Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, New York،
- Mackie, John Leslie.(1988). The Subjectivity of Values, in Essays on Moral Realism, ed. by Geoffrey Sayre McCord, New York، Cornell University Press.
- McDowell, John Henry.(1998). Mind, Value and Reality, London،
- Olson, J. (2014). Moral Error Theory: History, Critique, Defence. Oxford.
- Olson, J) 2010(. In Defence of Moral Error Theory. In New Waves in Metaethics, ed. M. Brady, 62–84. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Pojman, Louis, P.(2011). Ethics Discovering Right and Wrong,USA،
- Sayre-McCord, g .(2010). Moral Skepticism in the Routledge Companion to Epistemology, edited by Stiven Bernecker and Duncan Pritchard (Routledge, 2010), pp. 464-474.
- Shafer-Landau, Russ. (2003). Moral Realism: A Defence, Oxford University Press.
- Shafer-Landau, Russ .(2005). ERROR THEORY AND THE POSSIBILITY OF NORMATIVE ETHICS, Philosophical Issues, 15, Normativity, 107-120
- Shafer-Landau, Russ .(2012). Fundamentals of Ethics, Oxford University Press.
- Shafer-Landau, Russ .(2018). Living Ethics: An Introduction with Readings, Oxford University Press.
- Smith, M .(1994). The Moral Problem. Oxford: OUP.
- Smith, M .(2006). Beyond the Error Theory, In: A World Without Values Essays on John Mackie’s Moral Error Theory, Richard Joyce · Simon Kirchin Editors, Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York
- Sturgeon, Nicholas.(1986). What Difference does it make whether moral realism is true? , The Southern Journal of Philosophy, Vol. XXIV, Supplement: 115-141
)