Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 M.A student in philosophy, Imam Khomeini International University

2 Assosiate Professor in Philosophy, Imam Khomeini International University, Iran

10.30465/os.2024.47810.1953

Abstract

Introduction
In the present day, we are faced with the dominance of various and plural and sometimes contradictory discourses, which is famous for the post-modern era, and this relative dominance seems to be trans-valued and trans-ethical, after the weakening and falsification of any rational, scientific, traditional and discursive criteria in the explanation. The criteria of correctness and truth are summarized in the pseudo-proposition "every opinion is respectable and worthy of value". Therefore, it is necessary to understand our times better by returning to the beginning of the modern era and analyzing the discourses and values of that era. According to the author's belief, it is indispensable to deal with the romanticism movement as one of the influential and revolutionary discourses that emerged simultaneously with the development of modernity in the West. In this article, an attempt is made to examine and analyze the movement of German romanticism from a philosophical point of view. Historically, the tradition of Romanticism was strongly highlighted by German thinkers in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Although traces of the ideas of this intellectual tradition can be found in Britain and France, it was in Germany that the artillery of romanticism was equipped with intellectual-philosophical tools as much as possible and, according to Isaiah Berlin, led to a revolutionary change in the history of Western thought. Specifically, the opinions of two important philosophers of this era, namely the peak of enlightenment, Immanuel Kant and the spirit of storm and drang, Gottfried Herder, are of great importance in the romanticism movement. It should be noted that although the philosophy of German Romanticism is influenced by what Isaiah Berlin calls anti-Enlightenment thought, but considering the influence that this tradition has received from the aspects of Enlightenment thought, as Friedrich Beiser believes, it cannot be completely anti- Enlightenment summed up. From this point of view, considering the deep relationship that exists between contemporary philosophies, especially the so-called continental philosophy with the philosophy of romanticism and specifically the Athenaeum circle, here an attempt is made to give a general outline of this relationship, both in the final summary of each It should be drawn from the middle parts of the writing and in an independent part under the title of the legacy of romanticism in contemporary philosophy.
 
Methodology
In order to carry out this research work, we will use Berlin's and Beiser's works, specifically their works about romanticism, in order to explain Their ideas clearly. Therefore, we have attempted to critique and evaluate their views by utilizing descriptive-analytic methods, relying on commentators' views, and utilizing authentic sources and documents.
 
Discussion and Conclusion
Romanticism's attempt to create a synthesis between the Enlightenment movement and the storm and drang movement in the field of philosophy, aesthetics, ethics and politics is worthy of consideration. But too much emphasis on modern anti-rationalist ideas, in certain circumstances, leads to the collapse of order, ethics and political order. Although the ideas of romanticism in the individual sphere can moderate the problems of modern life, it is necessary to reconsider the application of these ideas in the collective sphere.
 
 

Keywords

Bibliography
Ameriks, K. (2000). The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism, translated by Hassan Mortazavi, Tehran, Elmi – Farhangi Publication [in Persian].
Adler, H & Koepke, W. (Eds.), (2009). A Companion to the Works of Johann Gottfried Herder. Camden House.
Beiser, F. (1992). The Early Politics and Aesthetics of Friedrich Schlegel, in Enlightenment, Revolution and Romanticism: The Genesis of Modern German Political Thought 1790–1800, (pp. 245–263). HUP.
Beiser, F. (2004). The Romantic Imperative the Concept of Early German Romanticism, translated By Masood Azarfam, Tehran, Qoqnoos Publication [in Persian].
Bristow, W. (2023). Enlightenment. In Zalta, E & Nodelman, U. (Eds), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/enlightenment
Berlin, I, (1976). Vico and Herder: Tow studies in the history of ideas, translated by Edris Ranji, Tehran, Qoqnoos Publication [in Persian].
Berlin, I, (1999). The Romanticism, translated by Abdolah Kosari, Tehran, Mahi Publication [in Persian].
Berlin, I, (1993). The Magus of the North: J.G Hamann and the Origins of Modern Irrationalism, translated by Reza Rezaei, Tehran, Mahi Publication [in Persian].
Cassirer, E. (1951). The Philosophy of the Enlightenment, translated by Yad’allah Moqen, Niloofar Publication [in Persian].
Durant, W. (1935). The Story of Civilization: Rousseau and Revolution, translated by   Zia Tabatabaie, Tehran, Elmi-Farhangi Publication [in Persian].
Forster, M. (2023). Johann Gottfried von Herder. In Zalta, E & Nodelman, U. (Eds), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/herder
Frank, M. (2004). The Philosophical Foundations of Early German Romanticism. Millán-Zaibert, E. (trans). Sunny Press
Guyer, P. (2023). 18th Century German Aesthetics. In Zalta, E. (Eds), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.  https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/aesthetics-18th-german
Gay, P. (1966). The Enlightenment: An Interpretation. Knopf
Gorodeisky, K. (2016). 19th Century Romantic Aesthetics. In E.N. Zalta (Eds), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/aesthetics-19th-romantic
Hay, K. (2017). August Wilhelm von Schlegel. In E.N Zalta (Eds), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.  https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/schlegel-aw
Kant, I. (1800). Critique of Judgment, translated by Abdolkarim Rashidian, Tehran, Ney Publication [in persian].
Robert, D & Murphy, P. (2006). Dialectic of Romanticism: A Critique of Modernism. Continuum studies in Philosophy.
Rush, F. (2019). The Cambridge companion to Hermeneutics. Hermeneutic and Romanticism (pp: 65-87).
Seyhan, A. (1992). Representation and Its Discontents. UCP.