Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Art Research, Faculty of Art and Entrepreneurship, Isfahan University of Art, Isfahan, Iran

10.30465/os.2025.51316.2033

Abstract

Introduction
Research from psychology, archaeology, and evolution suggests that most prehistoric human societies were relatively egalitarian. However, the arrival of nomadic invaders, who conquered early agricultural cultures in Europe and the ancient Near East, appears to have established a male hierarchy. Since then, the history of human society has been marked by the appropriation of women and girls. This includes abduction, assault, and rape by men, ranging from victors of wars to close relatives, the legal trading of women as slaves, forced marriages, the selling of young girls, the deprivation of women’s capital and social rights, and the imprisonment or killing of learned or rebellious women. Additionally, any attempts by women to achieve their rightful rights and social status have often been suppressed. This oppressive structure has been reinforced over millennia by art, literature, philosophy, history, customary laws, mythology, and religions.
In the twentieth century, scientific achievements and egalitarian movements have successfully challenged much of this old dogma, at least in developed societies, leading to the establishment of anti-misogynistic laws as the norm. However, in many countries, women still suffer from domestic violence, assault, rape, traditional customs, forced marriages, child marriages, honor killings, and human trafficking.
 
Material & Methods
This article is a descriptive-analytical case study that utilizes qualitative data collected through documentary methods. The primary aim of this research is to explore the symbolic layers embedded in the visual practices of Birgit Jürgenssen, a contemporary Austrian artist. Many of her works critique the objectification of women by the patriarchal system prevalent in human culture. To better understand the social context surrounding her and to grasp the attitudes, beliefs, and motivations that inform her work, we will first analyze this concept and trace the historical background of related issues. Following this, several of her works - including paintings, photographs, installations, and body art - will be examined and interpreted, using purposive sampling (criterion-based selection). The selected examples aim to narrate and challenge the ways in which women are objectified.
 
Discussion of Results
Mass media, advertising, and the television and film industries constantly emphasize the aesthetic evaluation of women's bodies, promoting objectification. To sell more goods and services, these media often present stereotypical forms of beauty, instilling the idea that anyone who does not conform to these artificial standards is somehow deficient. Such advertisements can lead individuals to feel inadequate about their bodies, creating a perceived need to purchase the promoted products.
When women attempt to conform to these standards of the "perfect woman," which are largely defined through the male gaze, self-objectification occurs. Over time, women may internalize the external perceptions of others regarding their bodies, viewing themselves primarily through this lens, ultimately seeing their bodies as separate objects rather than as an integral part of who they are.
Historically, one of the most pervasive methods of objectification in art has been the portrayal of women as objects for male enjoyment. This trend is evident across the visual arts of various cultures, particularly in European painting. Birgit Jürgenssen, a renowned Austrian artist and a key figure in feminist art during the 20th century, served as a professor at the University of Applied Arts Vienna and the Academy of Fine Arts Vienna. She began her artistic career in the 1970s, a time when women faced significant barriers to acceptance in the professional art world, encountering both overt and subtle discrimination.
In art, women were often depicted as objects, models, or sources of inspiration for male artists, rather than being recognized as artists themselves. The societal position of women and the existence of unequal gender roles have significantly shaped the fundamental concerns of Jürgenssen's work from the outset.
Before her death at the age of 54 in 2003, Jürgenssen left behind a diverse body of work, including photographs, drawings, paintings, and graphic works, installations, and body art. Through these mediums, she explored the lived experiences of women, their fears and suffering, and the patriarchal prejudices they face. Jürgenssen’s art critiques social conventions, gender roles, beauty standards, and the dynamics between the sexes, often employing a surrealist style with ironic undertones.
She questioned the dominance of male desire and deconstructed the myth of power. Among the many works that have challenged misogyny, this article highlights twelve pieces that represent her thoughts and concerns over three decades of artistic activism. These works are categorized into four groups, each illustrating a common form of objectification of women.
 
Conclusions
Birgit Jürgenssen, a prominent Austrian feminist artist, has critiqued the objectification of women in many of her works. This article examines four distinct types of her critiques:

Stereotyping Women as Housewives: Jürgenssen portrays the lived experiences of women relegated to the role of housewives through nightmarish scenes filled with despair. Despite their talents, abilities, and aspirations, these women are trapped in a restrictive gender role.
Fetishistic Representation of High Heels: Jürgenssen uses a collection of shoes she designed to symbolically express the objectification and fetishization of the female body. High heels, which often cause muscular and skeletal pain for women, are nonetheless marketed and celebrated as a masculine fashion statement.
Women as Reproductive Tools: Equating women with nature serves as a method of exerting control over their bodies. This reductive view ignores women's feelings, independence, and personal desires, contributing to their objectification.
Masks Concealing Women's True Selves: Jürgenssen’s masks symbolize transformation, collapse, and disintegration, as well as retreat and refuge. While she confronts the viewer, the mask obstructs her ability to speak or even breathe.

Through her art, Jürgenssen exposes the cultural codes accepted in society that impose oppressive and limiting boundaries on women's lives and challenges the justifications for inequality.  

Keywords

Biblography

Barnish, M. S.; Barnish, J. (2016). “High-heeled shoes and musculoskeletal injuries: a narrative systematic review”. BMJ Open. 6 (1): e010053. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010053.
Berberick, Stevie N. (2010). “The Objectification of Women in Mass Media: Female Self-Image in Misogynist Culture”, The New York Sociologist, Vol. 5, pp. 3-15.
Berger, John (1972). Ways of Seeing. Penguin Books. ISBN:978-0140135152.
Bianca, Fransisca (2017). “Fetishism and Sexual Objectification towards African (Black) Women in Modern Society: Analyzing the Portrayal of African Women in the Media”. Jurnal Sentris. 1 (1): pp. 91-99. doi:10.26593/sentris.v1i1.4132.91-99.
Burger, Natascha; Fritz, Nicole (2019). “Birgit Jurgenssen Io Sono”, www.jamesmagazine.it. Access date: 31.01.2025.
Calogero, Rachel M.; Davis, William N.; Thompson, J. Kevin (2005). “The Role of Self-Objectification in the Experience of Women with Eating Disorders”. Sex Roles. 52 (1): pp. 43-50. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-1192-9.
Daniels, Elizabeth A.; Zurbriggen, Eileen L.; Ward, Monique L. (2020). “Becoming an object: A review of self-objectification in girls”, Body Image, Volume 33, pp. 278-299, doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.016.
Duffett, Judith (1968). “WLM vs. Miss America”. Voice of the Women's Liberation Movement. Access date: 28.01.2025.
Fredrickson, B. L. & Roberts, T. A. (1997). “Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks”. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21 (2), pp. 173-206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.
Frith, Katherine; Shaw, Ping; Cheng, Hong (2005). “The construction of beauty: a cross-cultural analysis of women's magazine advertising”. Journal of Communication. 55 (1): pp. 56-70. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02658.x.
Ford, Liz (2019). “Geena Davis: 'damaging stereotypes' on screen limit women's aspirations”. www.theguardian.com. Access date: 23.01.2025.
Freud, Sigmund (1905). Drei Abhandlungen zur Sexualtheorie. Fischer: Frankfurt am Main.
Freud, Sigmund (1988). Case Histories 2, Angela Richards (ed.), London: Penguin.
Goffman, Erving (1979). Gender Advertisements. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Goldenberg, Jamie L.; Roberts, Tomi-Ann (2004). “The Beast within the Beauty: An Existential Perspective on the Objectification and Condemnation of Women”. in: Greenberg, Jeff; Koole, Sander L.; Pyszczynski, Thomas A. (eds.). Handbook of Experimental Existential Psychology. New York: Guilford Press. pp. 71-85. ISBN:978-1-59385-040-1.
Gordon, M. K. (2008). “Media Contributions to African American Girls’ Focus on Beauty and Appearance: Exploring the Consequences of Sexual Objectification”. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32 (3), pp. 245-256. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00433.x.
Green, Fiona Joy (2010). “Patriarchal Ideology of Motherhood”. In: O'Reilly, Andrea (ed.). Encyclopedia of Motherhood, Volume 3. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. ISBN:978-1-4129-6846-1.
Gimbutas, Marija (1991). The Civilization of the Goddess: The World of Old Europe. San Francisco: Harper Collins. ISBN:978-0-06-250337-4.
Gruber, Natascha (2010). “Family Jewel. Birgit Jürgenssen – An Outstanding Artist of feminist Avant-Garde Art”, Mustekala Art Magazine, Nr. 3/10, Volume 39.
Gupta, Mayank; Madabushi, Jayakrishna S.; Gupta, Nihit (2023). “Critical Overview of Patriarchy, Its Interferences with Psychological Development, and Risks for Mental Health”. Cureus. 15 (6): e40216. doi:10.7759/cureus.40216.
Harper, B.; Tiggemann, M. (2008). “The Effect of Thin Ideal Media Images on Women’s Self-Objectification, Mood, and Body Image”. Sex Roles, 58, pp. 649-657 doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9379-x.
Hatton, Erin; Trautner, Mary Nell (2011). “Equal Opportunity Objectification? The Sexualization of Men and Women on the Cover of Rolling Stone”. Sexuality & Culture. 15 (3): pp. 256-278. doi:10.1007/s12119-011-9093-2.
Heldman, Caroline (2011). “Sexualizing Sarah Palin: the social and political context of the sexual objectification of female candidates”. Sex Roles. 65 (3): pp. 156-164. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9984-6.
Henslin, James M. (2001). Essentials of Sociology. London: Taylor & Francis. ISBN:978-0-536-94185-5.
Honneth, Axel (2004). “Eine soziale Pathologie der Vernunft: Zur intellektuellen Erbschaft der Kritischen Theorie,” in: C. Halbig and M. Quante (eds.), Axel Honneth: Sozialphilosophie zwischen Kritik und Anerkennung, Münster: LIT. ISBN: 978-3-8258-5769-7. pp. 9-32.
Johnson, Allan G. (2005). The Gender Knot: Unraveling Our Patriarchal Legacy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. ISBN:978-1439911846.
Jellema, A. H.; Huysmans, T.; Hartholt, K.; van der Cammen, T. J. M. (2019). “Shoe design for older adults: Evidence from a systematic review on the elements of optimal footwear”. Maturitas. 127, pp. 64-81. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.06.002.
Kang, Mee-Eun (1997). “The portrayal of women's images in magazine advertisements: Goffman's gender analysis revisited”. Sex Roles. 37, pp. 979-996. doi:10.1007/BF02936350.
Karsay, K.; Knoll, J.; Matthes, J. (2018). “Sexualizing Media Use and Self-Objectification: A Meta-Analysis”. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42 (1), pp. 9-28. doi:10.1177/0361684317743019.
Kaschak, Ellyn (1992). Engendered Lives: A New Psychology of Women's Experience. New York: Basic Books. ISBN:978-0465013494.
Kremer, William (2013). “Why did men stop wearing high heels?”. www.bbc.com. Access date: 23.01.2025.
Langton, Rae Helen (2009). Sexual Solipsism: Philosophical Essays on Pornography and Objectification. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN:978-0199551453.
Lewontin, Richard C.; Rose, Steven; Kamin, Leon J. (1984). The determined patriarchy. Not in our genes: biology, ideology, and human nature. New York: Pantheon Books. ISBN:978-0-14-022605-8.
L Hur, Jane; Gupta, Mayank (2013). “Growing up in the web of social networking: Adolescent development and social media”. Adolescent Psychiatry, 3 (3), pp. 233-244. doi:10.2174/2210676611303030004.
Lindner, Katharina (2004). “Images of Women in General Interest and Fashion Magazine Advertisements from 1955 to 2002”. Sex Roles. 51 (7/8): pp. 409-421. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000049230.86869.4d.
Lockard, Craig (2015). Societies, Networks, and Transitions: A Global History. Stamford: Cengage Learning. ISBN:978-1-285-78312-3.
Lukács, Georg (1923). Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein: Studien über marxistische Dialektik. Milton Keynes: Merlin Press.
Macionis, John J.; Plummer, Ken (2000). Sociology: A Global Introduction. Harlow: Prentice Hall. ISBN:978-0-13-040737-5.
Marx, Karl (1887). Capital, vol. I, S. Moore and E. Aveling (transl.), F. Engels (ed.), Moscow: Progress Publishers.
McKay, Tajare' (2013). “Female self-objectification: causes, consequences and prevention”. McNair Scholars Research Journal. 6 (1): pp. 53-70. ISSN:2166-109X.
McLaughlin, Bryan; Rodriguez, Nathian S.; Dunn, Joshua A.; Martinez, Jobi (2018). “Stereotyped Identification: How Identifying with Fictional Latina Characters Increases Acceptance and Stereotyping”. Mass Communication and Society. 21 (5): pp. 585-605. doi:10.1080/15205436.2018.1457699.
Mulvey, Laura (1975). “Visual pleasure and narrative cinema”. Screen. 16 (3): pp. 6-18. doi:10.1093/screen/16.3.6
Petrović. Gajo )1983(. “Reification”, in:  T. Bottomore, L. Harris, V. G. Kiernan, and R. Miliband (eds.). A Dictionary of Marxist Thought, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 411-413. ISBN:0674205251, 9780674205253.
Popa, Dorin; Gavriliu, Delia (2015). “Gender representations and digital media”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, pp. 1199-1206. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.244
Rimmaudo, Annalisa (2013). “Birgit Jürgenssen”, www.awarewomenartists.com. Access date: 25.01.2025.
Renner, Lois; Essl, Sammlung (2002). Augenblick: Foto, Kunst, Gabriele Bösch (ed.), Sammlung Essl. ISBN:978-3-902001-06-1.
Sanderson, Stephen K. (2001). The Evolution of Human Sociality. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN:978-0-8476-9534-8.
Sansi Roca, Roger (2015). “Fetishism”, in: James D. Wright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Vol 9. Oxford: Elsevier. pp. 105-110. ISBN:978-0-08-097087-5.
Santoniccolo, F., Trombetta, T., Paradiso, M. N., & Rollè, L. (2023). “Gender and Media Representations: A Review of the Literature on Gender Stereotypes, Objectification and Sexualization”. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20 (10), 5770. doi:10.3390/ijerph20105770.
Sartre, Jean-Paul (1943). L'Être et le Néant, Paris: Gallimard.
Schor, Gabriele; Solomon-Godeau, Abigail (2009). Birgit Jürgenssen. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz.
Seabrook, R. C., Ward, L. M., & Giaccardi, S. (2019). “Less than human? Media use, objectification of women, and men’s acceptance of sexual aggression”. Psychology of Violence, 9 (5), pp. 536-545.  doi:10.1037/vio0000198.
Sharabi, Hisham (1988). Neopatriarchy: A Theory of Distorted Change in Arab Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN:978-0-19-507913-5.
Swift, Jaimee; Gould, Hannah (2021). “Not an Object: On Sexualization and Exploitation of Women and Girls”. www.unicefusa.org. Access date: 27.01.2025.
Szymanski, Dawn M.; Moffitt, Lauren B.; Carr, Erika R. (2011). “Sexual objectification of women: advances to theory and research”, The Counseling Psychologist. 39 (1): pp. 6-38. doi:10.1177/0011000010378402.
Tedeschi Filho, Wagner; Dezzotti, Nei R.A.; Joviliano, Edvaldo E.; Moriya, Takachi; Piccinato, Carlos Eli (2012). “Influence of high-heeled shoes on venous function in young women”. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 56 (4): pp. 1039-1044. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2012.01.039.
Nussbaum, Martha C. (1995). “Objectification”. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 24 (4): pp. 249-291. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.1995.tb00032.x
Wolf, Katrin (2011). “A Caged Bird Sings”, www.theviennareview.at. Access date: 23.01.2025.