The Meaning of Being a Teacher According to Wittgenstein

Nikseresht, Mohammad

doi:10.30465/os.2026.53593.2083

The Meaning of Being a Teacher According to Wittgenstein

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Mohammad Nikseresht

PhD student in Philosophy of Religion, Allameh Tabatabaei University

10.30465/os.2026.53593.2083

Abstract

Introduction
Ludwig Wittgenstein is widely regarded as one of the most influential philosophers of the twentieth century, whose ideas profoundly shaped philosophy of language, epistemology, and educational thought. While his philosophical contributions have been extensively studied within the framework of analytic philosophy, his practical experience as an elementary school teacher in rural Austria has received comparatively less attention. Yet this period of teaching was not merely an episode in his life; it played a constitutive role in the transformation of his philosophical outlook from the early philosophy of the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus to the later philosophy of the Philosophical Investigations. Through his engagement with teaching, Wittgenstein came to realize that learning is not primarily a matter of acquiring definitions or abstract propositions, but rather a process grounded in practice, participation, repetition, and the mastery of rule-governed activities. These insights later became central to his concepts of language-games, forms of life, and rule-following. The present study seeks to explore the lessons that can be derived from Wittgenstein’s philosophical reflections and teaching experience for understanding the nature of teaching. It argues that Wittgenstein’s experience in the classroom provided not only practical insights into education but also the experiential foundation for some of the most important themes of his later philosophy.
Materials & Methods
This study employs a descriptive-analytical methodology based on extensive library research. Primary sources include Wittgenstein’s major works, particularly Philosophical Investigations, On Certainty, The Blue Book, and The Brown Book. These texts are examined alongside contemporary scholarship on Wittgenstein’s educational thought and historical studies of his years as a schoolteacher. The analysis focuses on several key concepts in Wittgenstein’s later philosophy—language-games, forms of life, family resemblance, rule-following, trust, and understanding—and investigates their implications for educational theory and pedagogical practice. Rather than attempting to reconstruct a systematic philosophy of education, the study adopts an interpretive approach aimed at extracting educational insights from Wittgenstein’s philosophical method and lived experience. By situating his philosophical ideas within the context of his teaching career, the research seeks to illuminate the reciprocal relationship between his educational practice and philosophical development.
Discussion & Result
The findings indicate that Wittgenstein’s teaching experience played a significant role in shaping his later philosophy and offers valuable insights into the nature of teaching. First, learning is shown to be grounded in practice rather than in the mere transmission of definitions or abstract explanations. Understanding emerges through participation in rule-governed activities, repetition, and guided practice. Consequently, the teacher’s role is not simply to convey information but to initiate students into meaningful forms of activity.
Second, the study highlights the fundamental importance of trust in education. Drawing on Wittgenstein’s reflections in On Certainty, learning is understood as beginning with a pre-reflective trust in teachers, language, and established practices. Such trust provides the necessary background against which questioning, reasoning, and understanding can develop.
Third, Wittgenstein’s concept of family resemblance challenges universal and fixed conceptions of teaching. Educational situations are diverse and context-dependent; therefore, effective teaching requires practical judgment and sensitivity to particular circumstances rather than strict adherence to predetermined methods.
Finally, the analysis reveals a close affinity between teaching and philosophizing. Both activities aim to overcome misunderstandings and guide individuals toward clearer forms of understanding. In this respect, the teacher resembles the philosopher by facilitating insight rather than merely delivering knowledge. Moreover, Wittgenstein’s example presents the teacher as a continual learner who engages in self-reflection and shared inquiry with students. Taken together, these findings suggest a dynamic conception of teaching centered on practice, trust, contextual judgment, and mutual learning.
Conclusion
The examination of Wittgenstein’s teaching experience and later philosophy reveals a rich and distinctive conception of teaching. For Wittgenstein, education is not primarily the transmission of information but participation in a form of life through which meaning, understanding, and competence emerge. Teaching involves guiding students in the acquisition of practices, cultivating trust, attending to the particularities of concrete situations, and fostering the development of judgment. His classroom experience led him to recognize that meaning is grounded in use, understanding is manifested in action, and learning occurs through participation in shared human activities. Consequently, the teacher is best understood not as a mere dispenser of knowledge but as a facilitator of understanding, a guide to practice, and a fellow participant in learning. Moreover, the study demonstrates that many of the central themes of Wittgenstein’s later philosophy were deeply rooted in his experience as a teacher. Teaching was not a peripheral aspect of his life but one of the most significant contexts in which his philosophical transformation occurred. Wittgenstein’s reflections continue to offer valuable insights for contemporary philosophy of education by presenting a dynamic, relational, and human-centered vision of teaching, one in which education becomes a shared journey toward meaning, understanding, and intellectual growth.

Keywords

Wittgenstein

Philosophy of Education

Teacher

Teaching

Burwood, S. (2017). “A Spontaneous Following”: Wittgenstein, Education and the Limits of Trust. In A companion to Wittgenstein on education: Pedagogical investigations (pp. 161-177). Singapore: Springer Singapore.‏

Chaliès, S., Bertone, S. (2017). "And if L. Wittgenstein Helped Us to Think Differently About Teacher Education?". In: Peters, M., Stickney, J. (eds) A Companion to Wittgenstein on Education. Springer, Singapore.

Cook, M. A., & Cook, A. P. (2008). "Wittgenstein in the Classroom: Notes on Teacher Reflection". Curriculum and Teaching, 23(1).p. 21-39.‏

Griffin, N. (1974). "Wittgenstein, Universals and Family Resemblances". Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 3(4), 635–651.

Harris, S. (2017)." Imagination and reality in Wittgenstein’s later philosophy". In A companion to Wittgenstein on education: Pedagogical investigations (pp.135-145). Singapore: Springer Singapore.

Neiman, A. (1995). "Wittgenstein, liberal education, philosophy". Studies in Philosophy and Education, 14 (2). p.201–215.

Peters, M. A., & Stickney, J. (2018a). "Picturing Wittgenstein’s Relationships to Education". In Wittgenstein’s Education:'A Picture Held Us Captive’ (pp. 1-28). Singapore: Springer Singapore.‏

___ ___ ___. (2018b)." Judging Portraits of Wittgenstein". In Wittgenstein’s Education:'A Picture Held Us Captive’ (pp. 29-58). Singapore: Springer Singapore.‏

___ ___ ___. (2018c). "Wittgenstein as a school teacher". In Wittgenstein’s Education:'A Picture Held Us Captive’ (pp. 59-85). Singapore: Springer Singapore.‏

Quinn, P. (2017). "The learner as teacher". In A companion to Wittgenstein on education: Pedagogical investigations (pp. 703-713). Singapore: Springer Singapore.‏

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (2004). Notebooks 1914-16 (G. H. von Wright & G. E. M. Anscombe, Eds., G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.

___ ___ ___. (1998).Culture and value (G. H. von Wright, Ed. in collaboration with Heikke Nyman, revised, P. Winch, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.

___ ___ ___. (2006). Preliminary studies for the philosophical investigations: generally known as the Blue and Brown Books. Translated by Iraj Qanooni. Tehran: Nay Publication. [in Persian]

___ ___ ___. (2019) . On Certainty. Translated by Seyyed Musa Dibaj. Tehran: Molly Publication. [in Persian]

___ ___ ___. (2021). Philosophical Investigations . Translated by Malek Hosseini. Tehran: Hermes Publication. [in Persian]

Pandamuz,M , Salahshoori,A , Sharifidaramadi,P , Fayyaz,I and Fariborz,ِ . (2023). The function of metaphor in learning from Wittgenstein's point of view: a systematic explanation. Occidental Studies, 14(1), 119-146. [in Persian]