Document Type : Promotional article

Authors

• seyedhassan falsafi talab ¹
• Jamal Soroush ²

¹ PhD in Pure Philosophy, Visiting Professor, Department of Education, Yazd Technical and Vocational College

² Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Literature and Humanities, Malayer University, Faculty Member, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology

Abstract

The distinction between Kant's idealism and dogmatic and material idealism is quite clear in the first critique. Another kind of idealism that Kant denies; Problematic idealism is that which considers human knowledge of the outside world through this inner experience and concepts, which also requires analytical reasoning. In contrast to this idealism, Kant argues for transcendental idealism, although he generally agrees fully with idealism formal idealism and its method. The fundamental question here is what is the difference between different types of idealisms? And what is the advantage of that type? And in what aspects is the reason for this superiority? In this article, we discuss the superior aspects of transcendental idealism over absolute idealism, while at the same time expressing the new problems that arise in this regard; Schopenhauer and Nietzsche also have winning critiques of the debate itself that have been addressed in this study, especially Nietzsche, who believes that Kant played a kind of game in this regard. In the final analysis, I came to the conclusion that Kant: has serious problems with the validity of recognizing and explaining certain foreign beings.

Keywords

• transcendental idealism
• experimental idealism
• dogmatic idealism
• things in themselves
• will to power